Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wordpress-seo domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/bcm/src/dev/www/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121
Sokoto | Zikoko!
  • Northern Nigeria Invasion: How Kano and Sokoto Fell to Britain

    If you’ve been religiously following the “Northern Nigeria Invasion” series, I have a bottle of wine to congratulate you. This is where we draw the curtain on it. However, key highlights from the two events we’ve covered are Lord Lugard’s British invasion of Northern Nigeria and the capture of the Bida and Yola Emirates.

    Catch up:

    • The British Empire declared Northern Nigeria a protectorate in 1900 but had no territorial control. They needed to gain power over the region due to the fear of European rivals outsmarting them and to gain the local leaders’ respect.
    • To do this, they called upon Frederick Dealtry Lugard, who grew from a British soldier to High Commissioner for Northern Nigeria in 1900.
    • After the official proclamation, he sent a memo to the Sarkin Muslmi, or King of the Sokoto Caliphate, to which there was no reply. This led to a rampage from Lugard to depose various emirates in the Caliphate. 
    • Amongst the lands he captured were the emirates of Bida and Yola. Bida fell due to a rebellion and their eventual alliance with the Royal Niger Company (RNC). Yola was captured due to the defiance of the Lamido, Zubaryu, who escaped capture from the British. The Lala tribe from Bornu State later killed him.

    For today, take your straws to sip the last drink and dive deep into what ultimately ended the Sokoto Caliphate—the fall of the Kano and Sokoto emirates.

    The Fall of Kano – January 1903

    A view of a part of Kano City (Inside the Wall) [New York Public Library]

    We must backtrack to Lugard’s feud with Sarkin Musulmi in 1900 to understand how Kano fell. His revenge mission against the launch started because the Sarki refused to respond to Britain’s proclamation of the North as a protectorate.

    To better understand the feud, read: Northern Nigeria Invasion: How Lugard Disrupted Sokoto Caliphate

    Lugard as colonial administrator, Northern Nigeria [Britannica]

    In 1902, Lugard finally received his long-awaited reply from the Sarki, but it wasn’t what he expected. Originally written in Arabic, the message says:

    “From us to you. I do not consent that anyone from you should ever dwell with us. No agreement can ever be made with you. I will have nothing ever to do with you….This is with salutations.”

    If we thought Lugard couldn’t get angry at Sarki, as we explored in the first edition, we might need to recount our words. The High Commissioner was as furious as ever, and as a result, he interpreted the Sarki’s response as an act of war, and an immediate annulment of the treaties between Sokoto and the Royal Niger Company (RNC) was drawn.

    However, scholars believe the message was sent to Lugard’s second in command, Commissioner Wallace, instead of him.

    How did Lugard launch the war?

    You must know that for Lugard to start a war, he needed the support of Britain’s Colonial Office in London, and those folks were not ready to engage in more battles without a reasonable cause. Lugard, knowing this, eventually got his chance when a British resident at Keffi, Kano, Captain Moloney, was killed under “mysterious circumstances.” 

    And who better to blame for the murder than the warrior chief of Keffi, Dan Yamusa? It didn’t help that Yamusa was already openly defiant of Britain’s rule in the North.

    The Sarki’s letter and Moloney’s murder were enough for Lugard to launch a war. And even though there was a window for negotiations with the new Sarkin Muhammadu Attahiru after the death of Abdurrahman, Lugard wasn’t having it. 

    The Sultan of Sokoto, Religious Head of Hausaland [Getty Images]

    He wanted to assert authority and was bent on using  Kano to prove his point.

    The Battle of Kano

    To make his reasons for war convincing to the Colonial Office, Lugard claimed that the emir of Kano, Aliyu, was marching with warriors to attack the West African Frontier (WAF).

    But in reality, the Emir was on the march—but only to pay homage to the new Sarki at Sokoto, hundreds of miles away. And even though the British didn’t buy Lugard’s excuse for a war, that wouldn’t deter him from his goal of total Northern Nigeria dominance.

    However, Lugard still had a major problem—the walls of Kano. These walls were specially designed for defence, with a 40 feet thick base and 30 to 50 feet high. The city also had ditches and cultivated farmland inside its walls, which the people could use to feed themselves in cases of siege. 

    The Ancient Walls of Kano [Naija Biography]

    Surprisingly, Lugard’s captain, Colonel Morland, found little to no resistance from the Kano army due to the Emir’s absence. They blew a hole in the wall, stormed the city, stormed the Emir’s palace, and hoisted the Union Jack (the de facto national flag of the UK of Great Britain) on top of the city walls. 

    The Fall of Kano [Kano Chronicle/Twitter]

    No British soldier was killed, and only 14 of them were wounded. Lugard then appointed the Emir’s younger brother as the new emir.

    Up next on Lugard’s hit list was Sokoto

    The Conquest of Sokoto Caliphate – March 1903

    In February 1903, Colonel Morland wrote a letter to Sarkin Attahiru informing him of the fall of Kano and their anticipated attack on Sokoto.

    “Sir Thomas Morland” [The Great War by Ed H.W. Wilson]

    Attahiru replied by informing Morland that he would consult with his advisers and get back to him, but they could never conclude between negotiation, battle, or outward defeat. With their inaction, Morland’s army proceeded to march into Sokoto.

    The War Against Sokoto Caliphate [LitCAF]

    “We chase and kill until there are no living men”

    On March 14, 1903, Britain fought with the Sokoto Caliphate outside the city walls. Fighting without the safety of their walls was a grave mistake for the Sokoto army, as they were no match for the British artillery and machine guns.

    However, the Sokoto army did not give up but stayed valiant until the end. They took the green flag of the Sarki into battle, and every time the flag bearer was shot, another would take his place—until all the flagbearers were dead. After the battle, the British infantry chased down what was left of the survivors and killed them. They also hacked legs and arms off corpses to take items of value. In a British soldier’s words:

    “We chase and kill till the area is clear of living men — and we tire of blood and bullets.”

    Comparatively, the casualties on the side of the British were remarkably small. Only two of their forces were killed—a carrier and a soldier. 

    The Aftermath

    Sarkin Attahiru survived the battle and fled. Lugard asked Sokoto officials to nominate a new Sarki, and they eventually chose a ruler named Attahiru. In a March 21, 1903, proclamation, Lugard told the people that even though they could practise their religion, all independent Fulani rule had ended. The British system of government was here to stay.

    What happened to Attahiru?

    He was still on the run alongside Kano’s former Emir, Aliyu. While in exile, Attahiru was able to garner supporters from surrounding villages. This was due to the anger of the indigenes towards the British for deposing the head of their religion.

    The British saw Attahiru’s fame and survival as a threat, and despite trying to capture the former Sarki six times at Burmi in the Borno Empire, all their efforts were in vain. In one of the battles, the British army got hit with poisoned arrows, which gravely injured two soldiers and six horses. To ease the two soldiers’ deaths, their colleagues shot them. 

    This article draws inspiration from Max Silloun’s “What Britain Did to Nigeria”

  • Everything We Know About the Murder of Deborah Samuel

    Deborah Samuel was a 19-year-old Christian from Tungan-Magajiya in the Rijau Local Government Area of Niger State. She was in her second year studying home economics at the Shehu Shagari College of Education, Sokoto. 

    Four days ago, Deborah was killed by a mob of her Muslim classmates who claimed she had blasphemed against the Prophet Muhammad. A video of this religious execution circulated online and sparked debates across the country on the limits of religious expression and why this murder was not being called a murder. Here’s everything we know so far.

    The beginning

    On Thursday the 12th of May 2022, Deborah Samuel was stoned, flogged and burnt to death in Sokoto after posting a message on the class group chat. According to a coursemate of the deceased, Deborah had been asked how she passed their examinations from last semester. Her response was “Jesus o.” Three of her classmates didn’t take too kindly to the religious response and requested that she retract the statement. Eventually, word got to Deborah’s close friends on some Muslim boys who took the matter more seriously than expected, and they also tried to persuade her to retract the statement, but Deborah was unwavering. Her response to the request was this voice note. Here’s a translation in English:

    “Holy Ghost fire! There’s nothing that will happen to us. Everything they’re pushing to us is rubbish. It’s not like they created the group to send reasonable information. If there’s a test, or an assignment, they should put it on the group, not the rubbish they’re sending. No be only prophet.”

    Those were the words that led to the undeserving retaliation from her classmates and cheers from observers as she lay dying.

    What are the police doing right now?

    According to the police command’s public relations officer, Sanusi Abubakar, at about 7 a.m., a distress call was received from authorities at the Shehu Shagari College of Education. In response to the alleged call, the Deputy Commissioner led a team of policemen and operational commanders to the scene of Deborah’s death. Things were brought under control and, according to Sanusi, two suspects were arrested at the scene of the crime. 

    The school was also shut down in line with efforts to carry out an investigation of the incident. In response to the violent outburst, Sokoto’s Commissioner of Police, Kamaldeen Okunkola assured that all faces recognised in the viral video shared will be reprimanded according to national laws.

    What are religious authorities saying on this matter?

    While the Sultan of Sokoto condemned the horrific acts by Deborah’s classmates, the incident has sparked debates on what course the law will take in response to this crime. On Saturday, supporters in Sokoto set out to demand the release of the apprehended suspects from the scene of Deborah’s death. 

    The Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) has appealed for calm in Sokoto and requested for demonstrators to respect the Sultan as the leader of Muslims in Nigeria. However, sources in Sokoto reported that major roads were shut down with shops and churches burnt, as youths rioted for the release of suspects arrested on Thursday. The Imam of the National Mosque in Abuja, Prof. Ibrahim Maqari shared this tweet on Thursday, a few hours after Deborah’s death.

    The tweet led to comments from Nigerians questioning the views of the Imam and the seeming consideration for Sharia law over judicial court procedures. 

    These online discussions were linked to Section 204 of Nigeria’s Criminal Code entitled “Insult to religion”. The section states:

    Any person who does an act which any class of persons consider as a public insult to their religion, with the intention that they should consider the act such an insult, and any person who does an unlawful act with the knowledge that any class of persons will consider it such an insult, is guilty of a misdemeanour and is liable to imprisonment for two years.

    While the question of lawful proceedings to take currently remained unanswered, the president of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), Samson Olasupo Ayokunle, has requested for all church leaders to organise a peaceful protest on the 22nd of May 2022 to demand justice for Deborah.

    The Kaduna State Security Council has banned all religious protests until further notice for security reasons as many fear a spillover of the violence in Sokoto. After the protest on Saturday, the Sokoto State Governor, Aminu Waziri Tambuwal declared a 24-hours curfew in the Sokoto metropolis. It’s unclear whether this state of emergency will be extended at this time. 

    And Buhari?

    President Buhari released a statement 24 hours after the viral video of Deborah’s death was released. 

    The Vice President of Nigeria, Prof. Yemi Osibanjo echoed the views of the President in a statement on Saturday 14th of May 2022. Presidential aspirant and former Vice President of Nigeria, Atiku Abubakar, also weighed in on the conversation with a tweet on Thursday night.

    After the tweet, his comment section was flooded with Muslims, particularly in Sokoto, threatening his prospects of winning electoral votes in the north. Succumbing to the angry threats, the tweet was deleted by Friday. 

    Nigerians took this as an act of hypocrisy and subtle support for the actions against Deborah, but Atiku clarified that the tweet was taken down because it wasn’t approved by him. He further assured Nigerians that he is not afraid to take a stand against Sharia laws, but requires consent for such tweets to be on his official page.

    Tweets in response to Atiku’s deleted tweet

    The Samuel family

    For now, there has only been a video of scenes from Deborah’s burial in her hometown in Niger. It’s unclear what legal actions her family is taking at this time, or if there are more suspects being investigated for her murder in Sokoto. 

    Editor’s note: Zikoko is including a fundraising link within this article for the family of Deborah Samuel. Funds will be delivered directly to the family via bank transfer. We will not be determining what they do with the money, but only ensuring that they are not in financial difficulty at this time of great tragedy. They may wish to use it to access therapy, fortify their security, move, take care of burial/commemoration, and meet other needs. For transparency, we will work with TechHer who will verify the amount collected, and ensure that 100% of the money is transferred to the family.”